Though again, if you believe this then why not the accusers? I think it is more of a case of believe who you want. Child celebrities who were befriended by Michael in the 80s and 90s claimed he never did anything sexual or weird to them so it's all just made up. He went to trail over these allegations and two out of three times beat them and was never found guilt once (as for the missing time see below) He was doing something young kids would do innocently enough. So he might have done something like sleeping in the same bad as a child but that does not necessarily imply sexual relations. Instead he was stuck in a sort of infancy behaving and thinking like a child despite being a rich adult. This resulted in a stunted childhood where he was never really allowed to be a kid or develop mentally the same way as a regular child. Given the age of accusers it could be they were coached into saying things or are exaggerating things. They could be subject to change over time, or manipulated by outside factors. First hand/eye witness accounts are hard to prove. The account that he did are all from the children themselves. There is not actual evidence of him sexually abusing children. Don't know if you are still looking but I will try to provide some insight from my knowledge on this:
0 kommentar(er)
